榆林学院学报

新的文化使命是习近平文化思想主题，为中华民族伟大复兴规划文化蓝图。在“新的文化使命”引领下，民族复兴是以“文化生命体有机更新”为核心的文明复兴工程，不是简单国力增强，而是文明基因在马克思主义真理催化下的系统性重组与创造性转化。战略逻辑为“立魂（文化主体性建构）—赋能（‘两个结合’驱动）—铸形（文化认同与制度构建）—致远（人类文明新形态贡献）”的螺旋上升过程。成功关键在于化解文化复兴中三大矛盾：传统文明连续性与现代革命断裂性的叙事冲突、马克思主义真理与中华文明特殊性的理论张力、文化事业公平性与文化产业效率性的实践抉择。它以确立文化主体性为起点，在“两个结合”驱动下，通过“魂脉”与“根脉”结合，创造中国式现代化文化形态，转化为人民认同与制度支撑，最终建设中华民族现代文明，为人类文明新形态贡献智慧。本文阐释了从确立文化主体性、激活“两个结合”引擎，到构建认同与制度系统，再到实践方略的过程，为中国式现代化的文化维度提供学理阐释。最后指出，新的文化使命实现受理论彻底性、制度弹性与社会信任制约，须警惕文化主体性本质主义、科技异化人文精神、认同空心化等风险，要求以历史主动精神开辟实践道路。

The new cultural mission, as Xi Jinping's cultural thought theme, outlines a cultural blueprint for China's great rejuvenation. This rejuvenation is a civilizational revival project centered on “cultural organism”, organic renewal driven by Marxist truth. Its strategic logic spirals from establishing cultural subjectivity to contributing to a new human civilization via the two integrations. Success requires resolving contradictions in narrative, theory, and practice. Starting from cultural subjectivity and driven by the two integrations, it fosters a reaction to create a cultural framework for Chinese modernization, transforming into consensus and institutions, ultimately contributing Chinese wisdom. The article elucidates this process from subjectivity to practical strategies, providing a new theoretical perspective. Conclusion realization is constrained by theoretical thoroughness, institutional flexibility, and social trust; risks include erosion of subjectivity, alienation by technology, and hollowing of identity; it requires historical initiative.